![]() ![]() This issue arose again on Jwhen Petitioner's counsel attempted to return her client's attention to the events of April 3, 2006. Counsel was directed to requisition the files from New York County to determine what the allegations were and how they were settled. Counsel for the Respondent objected to questions about the Apincident on the grounds that it was settled in Manhattan Family Court on a prior filing under Docket # O-2278/08. ![]() During direct examination, counsel elicited testimony from the Petitioner regarding incidents occurring from Decemto February 3, 2010, and the three specific incidents in her petition: April 3, 2006, Novemand December 28, 2008. ![]() Trial began on Februwith the Petitioner' testimony. Two prior family offense petitions had been filed in New York County Family Court, one on April 24, 2006, and one on February 14, 2008. This petition described "the most recent incident" as occurring on Decemand "the most serious incident" as occurring on April 3, 2006. Petitioner is before the Court on her third family offense proceeding which she filed against the Respondent on January 14, 2009. Zimmerman, Esq., for the Respondentīefore the Court is a motion made in limine for a ruling on the admissibility of testimony regarding prior incidents that occurred on Apand March 28, 2007. Patricia Martin-Gibbons, Esq., for the Petitionerīrian J. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |